Pages

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Are greedy oil companies responsible for higher gasoline prices?

When something unpleasant happens, it’s helpful to have a scapegoat, and when there’s an economic crisis during a presidential re-election campaign, assessing blame is campaign strategy. With the recent rise in gasoline prices, the finger-pointers have been giving their digits a vigorous workout telling us who they want you to believe is responsible for the rising gas prices.

Blaming oil companies or speculators or George W. Bush may make people feel better about something they can’t control, and put political points on the board, but those things aren’t the problem. These price increases are a matter of basic economics, magnified by foolish energy policies.

Before the financial crisis hit in 2008, the price of West Texas Intermediate reached its high on July 14 at $145.16, and average gasoline prices reached their high the same day at $4.05 per gallon. The downward economic trend thereafter pushed oil down to $30.28 a barrel and pushed gasoline prices to an average low a week later at $1.59 per gallon.

As world economic growth picked up, so did oil prices, reaching a high of more than $109 a barrel last Friday, and gasoline prices also hit a recent high of over $3.60 a gallon. However, the change in both oil and gasoline prices fairly closely parallel world GDP growth.

Oil is the biggest factor in the cost of gasoline. John Felmy, chief economist at the American Petroleum Institute, explained last week that “when crude is at $100 for a standard 42‐gallon barrel … a refiner pays almost $2.40 for each gallon of that crude to make a gallon of gasoline” that is priced around $3.60 a gallon. “The next biggest component is taxes,” he continued. “They now average almost 49 cents a gallon, including federal, state and local taxes.” Crude oil and taxes comprise $2.89 of the cost per gallon of gasoline, more than 80 percent.

Further, he reports “crude oil prices are up because of supply and demand. World demand for crude is increasing as the economies of the world begin to recover, and the world’s excess oil production capacity is shrinking. Buyers of crude oil also are clearly concerned about the instability of major oil producing nations in North Africa and the Middle East.”

Some criticize oil companies for exporting fuel overseas. However, the weak economy and more efficient vehicles have left the US with a surplus of fuel; hence there is excess product that must be sold somewhere else. Exporting unsold US supplies keeps Americans working, many at good paying US refinery jobs, and also lowers the trade deficit. There are 9.2 million jobs in the oil and natural-gas industry in this country, and it accounts for 8 percent of GDP and is responsible for 78 percent of total domestic energy production. Imagine where those numbers would be if the Obama administration wasn’t committed to killing traditional American energy production.

Some think that “big oil” is greedy. Profits reached a high in 2008 of 10.12 percent, and have been 5.46 percent, 6.56 percent, and 7.31 percent since. If your company is making only six to 10 cents on a dollar of investment, that ain’t greedy, folks.

All of this is academic where President Barack Obama is concerned. Whatever complaint he may voice over gasoline prices is really just “gas,” because high prices are precisely what he wants. As long as traditional energy and traditional motor vehicles are affordable and popular, the green energy-driven nation that Mr. Obama obsesses about will not become reality.

In 2008 Steven Chu, who is now Secretary of Energy, said: “Somehow, we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to levels in Europe.” Mr. Chu and his boss think that ideally Americans ought to be paying around $10 a gallon for gasoline. And President Obama himself stated that a gradual increase to European levels would be a good thing.

Toward that end, a new Environmental Protection Agency proposal requires the sulfur content in gasoline to drop from 30 parts per million to 10 parts per million, and according to a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson from six US Senators (4 Republicans, 2 Democrats), this mandate will raise gasoline prices by 12 to 25 cents a gallon. The dream of European fuel prices gets a little closer to reality.

Democrat National Committee chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) said recently that “the Republican field … thinks that we just need to remain tethered and dependent on foreign oil because all they would do is more and more drilling.” This Alice-in-Wonderland assessment assumes that drilling for our own oil will keep us dependent on foreign oil. So much for Democrat energy policy.

Oil production has increased of late, “higher than it's been in eight years," the White House boasts. But this occurred in spite of, rather than because of, the Obama energy policy. Remember that Mr. Obama declared most offshore areas off limits, substantially decreased oil and gas leases in the Rockies, and rejected the Keystone XL pipeline. The increase in production comes from wells on private property where Mr. Obama cannot stop it, and that production began under George W. Bush.

Comments are invited

16 comments:

CK said...

hmmm... lets see...

Iran no longer sells to some of the big buyers in Europe following a recent embargo, so the Euro markets are now competing for the gas/oil from our typical suppliers, so yes, demand does drive up market prices (simple economics)...and with the Euro markets in greater competition with us for supplies, its only logical that prices would increase to their levels... I mean... if someone offered you more money for your product, why would you sell at a lesser rate? Doesnt really seem in the spirit of capitalism to lower prices when folks are so dependent and willing to pay top dollar...

... and oil supplies are dwindling worldwide... some estimates show less than 40yrs remain at our estimated rates of consumption... so "drill baby drill" is the chant of those who only live in the short term... a long term solution is needed... oil reserves will continue to diminish and there is no way to prevent it... we built our civilization around a finite resource and the clock is ticking..

... and I also love the reference to the federal, state and local taxes on gas and oil...

people often forget the things we take for granted paid for by tax dollars... police and fire services, safe roads and bridges, public parks and schools... just to name a few...

keep fighting the good fight Smokey...

James Shott said...

Nice try, but you are simply wrong.

CK said...

so Obama running a national conspiracy to drive us toward socialism and European equivalence is the correct conclusion?

or that oil supplies are actually a limitless resource that should be super cheap?

or that taxes actually pay for services that everyone benefits from?

James Shott said...

so Obama running a national conspiracy to drive us toward socialism and European equivalence is the correct conclusion?

Some/many of Obama’s policies are definitely statist. Bigger government controlling more everyday stuff is not the traditional American system our Founders created.


or that oil supplies are actually a limitless resource that should be super cheap?

The US has a HUGE supply of oil offshore and underground. According to recent government estimates, that is more than 116 billion barrels of UTRR oil on federal lands, which Obama closed to exploration and development. The more oil on the market, the less it will cost. Economics 101


or that taxes actually pay for services that everyone benefits from?

Whatever the role of taxes after they are collected, they are a factor in the cost of gasoline, comprising about 14% based upon the data I cited.

CK said...

haha... keep the standard list of GOP talking points coming...

it almost makes me think you are on Rupert Murdoch's payroll...

James Shott said...

You really have no clue what is going on, do you?

CK said...

I'd like to think I see the big picture on these issues...

James Shott said...

You are seeing only part of the picture.

And a distorted picture it is, especially if you truly believe I post "talking points."

Fantasy Land.

CK said...

it seems like a lot of your articles, post and general focus are very much related to the standard list of GOP talking points...

the Murdoch comment was really just a bit of passive-aggression... but the resemblance is there for the taking...

James Shott said...

Saying someone uses "talking points" when they express an opinion is a device intended to minimize the points made, as if the person making those points is unable to think for themselves, do independent research, and express an independent opinion.

That is what you alleged I did and have done.

If that is your opinion of me and my columns and posts, we really have nothing more to discuss.

CK said...

just seems like your opinions ALWAYS coincide with the stance of the GOP as a whole... even I, an Obama supporter and Democrat do not entirely agree with everything he or the party does or stands for and I am a big enough man to admit that...

didnt we already talk about how there are now "perfect" candidates or parties that fit our own unique political perspectives...

yet... it seems like you found the "perfect" political party and you proudly bash the Democrats any chance you get...and I find it hard to believe you disagree with everything the Democrats do or stand for...I'd like to see you say something good about something the Dems have done, even if it comes with a whole host of "if's, and's or but's" ...

i mean, do you not think the new healthcare mandate that lets children stay on parents healthcare until age 25 is a good thing?

just seems like you have an agenda, even if it is just to oust Obama this November...

James Shott said...

My positions often do not coincide with those of the GOP, because the GOP has drifted so far to the left. The GOP is not fiscally conservative; I am. The GOP does not believe in a limited federal government; I do. The GOP does not honor and defend our constitutional governmental system; I do.

I am not a Republican, have not claimed to be one for years, and only in one set of circumstances can I imagine calling myself a Republican, and that is if the ONLY other choice is “Democrat.” I am conservative with strong libertarian tendencies.

It is difficult to find something good to say about Democrats, not individual Democrats, but about the party, because it has become so radically leftist. I disagree with liberalism as strongly as it is possible to disagree with something. Liberalism is anathema to the existence of a democratic republic like the US is – or, was. Most of our problems today are the result of our decades-long drift from the free market capitalist system our Founders designed for us, and which was responsible for the great nation we became, before we began to lose faith and stray from the path. For the last 80 or so years, we have gradually altered the system so that the grand mess we find ourselves in today now threatens our very existence. Conservatives and libertarians are not responsible for that failure; liberals and standard-less moderates are responsible for it.

Yes, I have an agenda. First to try to save the nation while there is still time, and then to restore the system to the circumstances that enabled the USA to become the most free and successful nation in human history. The most important single step in that is to defeat Barack Obama, who is the weakest American ever to hold the office, and whose policies are hastening our collapse.

The healthcare debacle may have a few advantageous aspects, but generally is a destructive, big-government horror, created in the dark of night by one political party, the total damaging features of which we still have not completely discovered.

CK said...

Well said.

Anonymous said...

Patriots Energy Bill! (patriotsenergybill.com)

Our government subsidizes the production of ethanol used as motor fuel. It takes 1½ to 2 gallons of petroleum to produce one gallon of ethanol. Ethanol will only get about two-thirds the miles per gallon of gasoline, and because it is made from corn, grocery prices have sky-rocketed. A third grader could figure out this is stupid!
Ethanol actually costs us about $12.00 per gallon! The oil companies know that ethanol will never compete with gasoline!
I have a suggestion. Let’s bring the Ford, Chevrolet, and Chrysler cars with diesel engines, sold in Europe, to America. They get double the mileage of our gasoline engine cars. The Ford Focus gets 76.4 miles per gallon (www.ford.co.uk). The Chevrolet Cruze gets 51.4 miles per gallon (www.chevrolet.co.uk).
When you refine crude oil to produce diesel, you get about 4 more gallons per barrel. Combined this would cut our fuel consumption 60%.
Diesel engines run just as well on biodiesel, a combination of diesel and vegetable oil. We pay thousands of farmers to idle millions of acres of farm land to help keep farm prices up. This is called “the pick-program.” Instead we should pay them to produce vegetable oil to help power our vehicles.
Mass produced vegetable oil could easily compete with petroleum. Instead of giving billions of dollars a year to Arab countries that support the terrorists who kill our soldiers, we could support our farmers. The factories that produce ethanol could be converted to produce vegetable oil.
This plan would end our dependency on foreign oil, reduce our trade deficit, clean up the environment, stabilize our economy, help our farmers, protect our soldiers, and give jobs to Americans who are out of work!
Our congressmen and senators who are addicted to the oil companies PAC money will only support this plan if millions of Americans demand it. Our biggest threat isn’t the Russians, the Chinese, Muslim terrorists, or illegal aliens. It is the PAC money that buys our politicians!
The events taking place in the Middle East is all the excuse the oil companies need to bankrupt our fragile economy. We must put this plan into action before they raise our fuel prices to $10 a gallon or more.
“We” own this country, not the politicians, and not the oil companies. Our soldiers’ blood paid for this country and continues to keep it free. We owe it to our veterans to become fuel sufficient. The future safety and security of the American people should never be left in the hands of foreigners!
This plan would heal our economy, protect our jobs, and make our country stronger and safer. I call this plan the “Patriots Energy Bill.”
Every American can be a Paul Revere. Call your congressmen, senators, the press, and everybody you know and demand the passage of the Patriots Energy Bill.

Gary C. Brown (gcbrown2011@windstream.net)
2191 Hwy 247C
Byron, Ga. 31008
478-956-3169

Xander Lawson said...

To some extent, greed can be blamed. There's nothing wrong about making a profit, unless you make too much of it really quickly. The sad thing is, this affects other markets as well - from brisbane motor auctions to the local groceries.

Elizabeth J. Neal said...

The downward economic trend thereafter pushed oil down to $30.28 a barrel and pushed gasoline prices to an average low a week later at $1.59 per gallon. Ascenergy