The federal
government’s efforts to restrict the freedoms Americans have enjoyed for more
than 200 years have gotten so preposterous recently that the most of these
efforts leave people incredulously saying, “Seriously?”
To wit: The
Environmental Protection Agency recently went after people who burn wood to
heat their homes. Trying to destroy the coal and oil industries isn’t enough,
now the EPA thinks wood – an inexpensive, renewable energy source – which is the
mainstay of rural homes and of some of the nation’s poorest residents, is
harmful, and the agency has banned the sale of 80 percent of wood-burning
stoves.
And now the nation’s
most out-of-control agency has charcoal grills in its crosshairs, and has
funded a project at the University of California with $15,000 of taxpayer money
to study the emissions from grease drippings when people indulge in that
dangerous activity, outdoor cooking.
First it was
toilets, because they used too much water; then inexpensive, safe incandescent
light bulbs, which have been replaced with CFLs that contain mercury and emit
ultraviolet radiation; and now wood stoves and potentially outdoor grilling. There
are too many people on the payroll at the EPA with too much time on their
hands.
These efforts
are necessary, we are told, to keep the world from grinding to a halt because
of … well, some horrible disaster related to climate change, or global warming,
or whatever the alarmists are now calling their imagined cataclysm.
Each time some
new target becomes public we ask, “Can it get any worse?” Unfortunately, the
answer always is, “Yes.”
The EPA is not
the only arm of the government harming the good citizens they exist to serve.
The Department of Justice has jumped blindly onto that bandwagon with a program
even more intolerable than the EPA’s misadventures called Operation Choke
Point, which looks way too much like something you would find in other
less-free countries, or perhaps used by mob bosses in Chicago.
Operation
Choke Point is a method of preventing perfectly legal businesses from being
able to operate satisfactorily, not by pointing to a law these businesses have
broken or a shady practice they have indulged in, or by going through
legislative channels to have what they do declared illegal, as our concept of
the rule of law demands, but by underhandedly strong-arming financial
institutions with whom these business have accounts, and “convincing” them to
not do business with these merchants any longer.
Businesses such
as ammunition sales, escort services, on-line gambling, so-called “racist
materials,” third party payment processors, payday lenders, and online lenders,
have been targeted simply because someone in the DOJ or higher up in the
administration doesn’t like them. Some are perhaps undesirable, but all are legal.
What happens
is that the DOJ and bank regulators pressure banks and other third-party
payment processors to cease providing or deny banking services to industries
the government alleges pose a “reputation risk” to the bank or service provider.
Last May, Todd
Zywicki wrote in The Washington Post
the “initiative has been shrouded in secrecy, but now it is starting to come to
light … and since then it has been difficult to discover details
about it … Without an ability to process payments, the businesses
– especially online vendors — cannot survive.”
The irony is that
while the DOJ and bank regulators are choking off financial services to
perfectly legal industries, they are also encouraging banks to provide banking
services to illegal marijuana sales.
When you have
people in high offices that are more interested in serving some ideological god
than they are in serving the American people, and when that ideological god
demands the improper use of government force against legal activities, something
must be done to stop it.
And last week,
the U.S. Senate started down that road. The Senate Budget Committee approved an
amendment to end Operation Choke Point, and according to The Daily Signal, Committee member Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, will
offer an amendment this week to the Senate’s budget proposal to defund the DOJ
program.
Sen. Crapo
last year commented that Operation Choke Point “has morphed into an attempt to
shut down entire industries of law-abiding and legitimate merchants.” And he
sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder expressing “strong concerns”
about the program. Unsurprisingly, the Justice Department, declared that it has
“no interest in pursuing or discouraging lawful conduct.”
And the House
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will question FDIC officials about
the agency’s involvement in Operation Choke Point, and hopes to find out who
was involved, how high up it goes, and whether anyone has been held
accountable.
The answer to
that last item will likely be “No.” It is virtually unheard of for federal
employees to pay a price for their malfeasance. It is also likely we will not
learn the any names associated with this outrageous offense.
Cutting
funding for the EPA, the DOJ, and any/every other agency that over-reaches is an
appropriate mechanism to redress the wrongs they commit against the American
people. The government spends far too much money, and cutting spending where it
is being used wrongly or unconstitutionally ought to be celebrated by every
freedom loving American.
No comments:
Post a Comment