The liberal left’s Pavlovian response to mass shooting
incidents is always blaming too many guns, too easy access to guns, and the
availability of the wrong kind of guns. More recently the subject has broadened
to include keeping certain types of people from buying guns, an aspect that at
least contains a degree of rationality.
President Barack Obama went to Orlando, FL last week to
offer condolences to the families of victims of the Pulse nightclub shooting,
but could not resist turning the subject from the victims and their suffering
in this tragedy into an opportunity talk about guns.
Three Democrats walked out of the House of Representatives chamber
when Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., asked for a moment of silence in memory of
those killed and injured in the Orlando shooting, and later during regular
House business when Ryan tried to call up a measure for a vote, Democrats began
shouting over the announcement of the bill being voted on.
Favored targets for blame, rather than the actual perpetrators
and their motives, are the National Rifle Association (NRA) and conservatives
and/or Republicans, which is a common theme despite the fact that none of the
killers have been members of the NRA, conservatives or Republicans. What the
NRA, conservatives and Republicans realize that liberals do not is that absent
the intent to commit murder, guns – like hammers, butcher knives and motor
vehicles – are inanimate objects. Every day tens of millions of guns harm no
one, especially those under control of law-abiding citizens. Guns are not the
problem; they are but a tool and only harm when used by someone with the intent
to harm or occasionally by accident.
There is also a near-universal misidentification of weapons
these killers use: “assault weapons.” The fact is
that no true assault weapon has been used in any mass shooting.
Assault
weapons – which are fully automatic, or have the capability to be used in
fully-automatic mode – are illegal in the U.S. Weapons used in mass shootings are
semi-automatic pistols, semi-automatic rifles, revolvers, or shotguns. Just
because a weapon has characteristics of appearance and similar accessories to
assault weapons does not make it an assault weapon. Those using that term are
either ignorant about the subject, or are deceptively using it for its
emotional value, trying to gin up support for their cause.
The gun control faction’s desires run a broad gamut from
banning all guns, to banning some types of guns, to preventing some particular
people from getting any sort of gun at all, and using the no-fly list, the
terror watch list and mental health issues as disqualifying elements.
Before starting down the road to implementing some
restrictions, we must remember that America is “the land of the free and the
home of the brave,” formed to guarantee personal liberty, and America reached
heights previously unknown in history due to its singular devotion to freedom. We
cannot trample on the freedoms of millions of American citizens in order to discover
the relative few who have evil intent.
Thus:
* Suggesting a total gun ban is dead on arrival.
* Trying to limit the kinds of guns people may purchase begs
the question of who decides, and how; and opens the door for dictatorial abuse
by the politically motivated.
* Denying gun purchases to people on the no-fly list, terror
watch list or who have been flagged for a mental health issue is fraught with
potential for errors and abuse. Journalist Stephen Hayes found
himself on a terrorist watch list, as did South Africa’s Nelson Mandela and at
least two children 6 and 8 years of age. The late Sen. Ted Kennedy was denied
boarding a plane back to Washington while in the Senate. What could possibly go
wrong?
Americans are protected from arbitrary denial of
Constitutional rights through a legal due process proceeding, where evidence
must be offered and a specific ruling made to approve taking one’s rights. West
Virginia Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin seems ready to ditch due process. The Weekly
Standard quoted Manchin as saying, "The problem we have — and really,
the firewall we have right now, is due process. It's all due process … due
process is what's killing us right now."
Two other factors scream out for
attention, things that mass shootings have in common. First, all of them have
occurred in places that were declared “gun-free zones,” where guns were
forbidden. This is an open invitation to someone bent on committing an
atrocity.
Second, many/most of them were committed
by Muslims inspired by al Qaeda, ISIS or some other source of Islamist
anti-American fervor. That factor existed in the Pulse nightclub, Sandy Hook Elementary School, Fort Hood, and the San
Bernardino shootings, for example.
President
Obama turns back-flips to avoid using the term “radical Islam” to describe
these murders, saying that Islam is a religion of peace. Okay, fine. But not
all Muslims adhere to that creed, and the killers among them pledged allegiance
to Allah during these far too-frequent events.
We cannot eliminate
or reduce these atrocities by continuing to ignore these two factors. Political
correctness be damned; our lives are too important for PC.
2 comments:
The fact is quite simple make all the laws you want criminals etc don't/ won't follow them hence they are a waste of time and effort
True, that, Steve. However, where guns are concerned, common sense like that takes a back seat to solutions that won't/can't work.
Post a Comment