Writing in Foreign Policy, Douglas Wissing presents a 
picture of the Afghan entanglement that is sharply at odds with the 
official line out of Washington, coming not only from the politicians, 
but from military leaders as well.
His account begins: “If observers had any doubts about the failure of
 the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan, the past several 
days should have put them to rest. Since Feb. 21, anti-U.S. protests have erupted
 in virtually every major Afghan city over the revelation that American 
personnel had burned Qurans at Bagram Airfield, the largest U.S. 
installation in the country. The demonstrations have at times turned 
violent, claiming the lives of at least seven Afghans. This wave of 
protest is just the latest example of how the United States has botched 
its attempt to win “hearts and minds” in Afghanistan, and another 
indicator that its war effort is heading toward failure.”
And then, this: “Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis has traveled over 9,000 
miles across Afghanistan to learn a simple lesson: public statements 
made from podiums in Washington and Kabul bear little resemblance to the
 reality of the Afghan war. The 17-year U.S. Army veteran spent most of 
his time in the insurgency-enflamed provinces in the east and south, and
 was shaken to discover the U.S. military leadership’s glowing 
descriptions of progress against the Taliban insurgency did not jibe 
with the accounts of American soldiers on the front lines of the war.”
Read the rest of Wissing’s account at Foreign Policy

3 comments:
A boat is a hole in the water into which you throw large sums of money...
If Afghanistan were surrounded by water, it would be exactly the same...
A hole into which we are throwing vast sums of U.S. tax dollars that WE don't have to spend..
We didn't learn anything from the Russian's experience from '79 to '88.
hell, we armed the taliban against the russians back then and now they shoot us with our own weapons...
same as we did with Saddam under Ronald McReagan...
Post a Comment