With the country
facing the $16.4 trillion debt limit in two months – which works out to about $52,000 per
man, woman and child – and with the government spending about a third more than it
collects every year, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said Friday that
president Barack Obama should
invoke the Constitution to raise the debt ceiling on his own, circumventing Congress. “I would do it, in a second, but
I’m not the President
of the United States,” Mrs.
Pelosi said.
She believes
the 14th Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution, which states that the validity of U.S.
public debts “shall not be questioned,” gives Mr. Obama all the authority he
needs to raise
the ceiling.
That’s just
what the country needs: the biggest spending president in the history of the
nation by far – with trillion-dollar-plus deficits every year of his presidency
– having the ability to unilaterally increase the amount of money the country
borrows whenever he wants to.
Barack Obama is
an irresponsible spendthrift who has shown no capacity for fiscal matters, and therefore
needs a mechanism, like Congressional intervention, to keep him from
bankrupting the country. Congress must not allow him to invoke the 14th
Amendment.
Former White
House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is quoted as having said something like “never
let a good crisis go to waste,” and anti-gun zealots have thus initiated new
efforts to ban scary looking so-called “assault weapons,” or even repeal the 2nd
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to prevent future mass murders like the
Newtown, CT school incident in which 26 people were murdered by what most
people understand was a crazed individual.
Other Americans
are justifiably concerned about such violence and also support those measures. But
those prescriptions miss the point: The factor responsible for this horrible
incident was the state of mind of the murderer, not guns or the 2nd Amendment. What
we must focus on are mental health issues, our dramatically devolved culture,
and providing better school security.
The Founders,
who had just put their lives on the line to gain independence, understood that
Americans must be guaranteed the right to defend themselves with weapons equal
to those that may be used against them. Some states felt so strongly that
certain rights, like the right to bear arms, needed to be explicitly guaranteed
that they would not ratify the Constitution without the Bill of Rights being
included.
If measures
such as those that are being advocated were in force in the 1770s, we would be singing
“God Save The Queen” as our national anthem.
One of the
reasons our country is in such horrible condition at this time is that some of
our elected representatives have been in office for decades, during which time
their perspective has most often changed for the worse. Long tenure in office
is contrary to the concept of citizen leaders who serve their country for a short
time, and then return to civilian life, as it was early in our history. This
same problem exists for presidents as well as Congresspersons.
Even if we have
someone a majority of Americans regard as a good president in office, removing
the ban restricting his or her tenure to eight years opens the door to
eventually having a “president for life” which is not so different from being
ruled by a king. That didn’t work out so well prior to 1776, and there are
examples throughout history where people stayed too long in office to their
country’s detriment.
Franklin Delano
Roosevelt was elected four times, and his policies extended the Great
Depression by several years and deepened its effects, increasing the suffering
of the people who elected him. When the U.S. Supreme Court decided FDR’s
Agricultural Adjustment Act was unconstitutional, he attempted to overcome the
Court’s opposition by increasing the number of Justices, and doing so by adding
appointees favorable to his policies.
His behavior
prompted the proposal for and the adoption of the 22nd Amendment,
which is one of the best things resulting from FDR’s presidency.
Eight years is
enough for a president to hold office. Leave the 22nd Amendment
alone.
As 2013 begins the country still languishes in non-recovery
from the 2008 recession, President
Barack Obama gave a New Year’s gift to returning members of Congress, federal
workers and Vice President Joe Biden by signing an executive order ending a
years-long pay freeze.
Federal
employees are already paid more than their private sector counterparts. “The
federal government paid 16 percent more in total compensation than it would
have if average compensation had been comparable with that in the private
sector, after accounting for certain observable characteristics of workers,”
the Congressional Budget Office reported.
Government
employees at all levels exist to serve the public. They should not be treated
less well than private sector workers, but sometimes when circumstances
warrant, they must make sacrifices, like everyone else has to do. And considering
the nation’s critical fiscal condition alluded to above, any additional non-essential
spending is plain foolish.
The House of Representatives has voted to rescind Mr.
Obama’s Executive Order.
2 comments:
It's time to reread The Pied Piper of Hamelin. It's about leaders that make irresponsible promises, and delusive enticements.
It's not surprising that there are demagogues like Obama around, but it is a little scary that so many either can't see through his BS, or actually agree with it.
Post a Comment